Book review : “Pearl Harbor: The Verdict of History”

 Book review : “Pearl Harbor: The Verdict of History” 

Photo courtesy : Amazone.in

"Pearl Harbour: The Verdict of History" is the second book in a trilogy about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Written by Gordon W. Prange, Donald M. Goldstein, and Katherine V. Dillon, and first published in 1986, it builds upon Prange’s earlier “At Dawn We Slept: The Untold Story of Pearl Harbor.” In “Verdict,” the authors thoroughly examine the events leading up to the attack and render historical judgments on who was bore responsibility for the American failure to prepare for a possible Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

  ◆ Introducing the Authors: 

Before delving into the intricate tapestry of "Pearl Harbor : The verdict of History", it is essential to appreciate the collective expertise brought to this seminal work by its distinguished authors: Gordon W. Prange, Donald M. Goldstein, and Katherine V. Dillon. Gordon W. Prange,a renowned historian and scholar, dedicated a significant portion of his career to unravelling the complexities of World War II. His authoritative voice in military history is evident in works such as "At Dawn We Slept," and his meticulous research laid the foundation for this collaborative effort. Donald M. Goldstein, a distinguished professor and military historian, brought his wealth of knowledge to the project. His commitment to presenting historical narratives with clarity and nuance is reflected in previous works such as "Miracle at Midway," showcasing his dedication to making complex military history accessible to a broad audience. Katherine V. Dillon, a respected researcher and collaborator, contributed her expertise to ensure a comprehensive and well-rounded exploration of the events leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor. Dillon's commitment to historical accuracy and detail is evident in her collaborative efforts with Goldstein on various military history projects. Together, this trio of authors combines decades of scholarship, research, and a passion for historical accuracy. Their collaborative effort, "Pearl Harbor: The verdict if History", emerges as a testament to their collectivededication to unravelling the complexities of one of the most pivotal moments in world history. The synthesis of Prange's foundational research, Goldstein's clarity of narrative, and Dillon's commitment to comprehensive detail creates a formidable literary collaboration that transcends traditional historical accounts. 

◆ Inside the Book: Pearl Harbor : 

The verdict of History " immerses readers in the gripping narrative of the days leading up to the infamous attack on Pearl Harbour. The authors meticulously reconstruct the geopolitical landscape, painting a vivid picture of the escalating tensions between nations. The book unfolds like a suspenseful drama, drawing on the authors' meticulous research to offer readers a front-row seat to the critical events that shaped the course of history. Prange, Goldstein, and Dillon rely heavily upon transcripts of several inquiries that took place at the end of World War II. Those investigations included one chaired by a Supreme Court justice; an Army Board of Inquiry, a Navy Court of Inquiry, and a joint Congressional committee. Each of these inquests had its own agenda. The Army shifted blame to the Navy, and the Navy indicted the Army. The Congressional committee wanted to pin blame on President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the most senior government officials in Washington, DC. The authors of “Verdict” sifted through an immense body of testimony and reports and arrived at three main conclusions: 

1.) Responsibility for American lack of preparedness leading to the destruction of the American fleet and the loss of 2,403 lives rested primarily with US Navy Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and Army General Walter C. Short, Jr. These commanding officers received advance warning of a possible attack from their respective headquarters in Washington, but did not heed those warnings. 

2.) There is no credible evidence that President Roosevelt, Secretary of War Henry Stimson, Navy Secretary Frank Knox, or any other government official conspired to withhold information from Kimmel or Short in order to allow the Japanese to attack, as a means of bringing the United States into the war. The authors’ arguments are persuasive and thoroughly backed up by their scrupulous research. 

3.) The attack on Pearl Harbor was brilliantly planned and executed by the Japanese on their own, "with no urging, tempting, or backstairs assistance" from anyone. The attack's overwhelming success rested as   much upon "superior Japanese effort and performance" as it did on American bungling. “Pearl Harbor: the Verdict of History” is a very well written book, but it is not an easy read. The inside pages of this work are adorned with a wealth of primary sources, including official documents, personal accounts, and intelligence reports. These sources, expertly woven into the narrative, provide a multifaceted perspective that goes beyond the surface of historical facts. Readers are given insight into the minds of key decision-makers, the strategic miscalculations that unfolded, and the intelligence failures that paved the way for the surprise attack. The military strategies and diplomatic manoeuvres leading to the attack are presented with a level of detail that is both enlightening and engaging. The authors seamlessly blend historical analysis with a narrative that captivates, making the complex web of events accessible to a broad readership. As readers traverse the pages of "Pearl Harbor: The verdict if History", they witness the convergence of political, military, and human elements that culminated in a moment of infamy. The book not only serves as a historical record but also invites contemplation on the complexities of decision-making in times of crisis, leaving an indelible mark on those who venture into its pages. 

◆ Other findings in the book :

 One of the book's notable strengths lies in its comprehensive approach to storytelling. The authors deftly weave together a tapestry of perspectives, blending official records, first hand accounts, and strategic analyses. This multifaceted approach not only renders a vivid portrayal of the attack but also enriches the reader's understanding of the geopolitical dynamics that culminated in this pivotal moment in history. The detailed research undertaken by the authors is evident throughout the narrative. The book not only chronicles the military aspects of the attack but also delves into the diplomatic manoeuvrings and intelligence failures that preceded it. This holistic exploration elevates "Pearl Harbor: The verdict if History" beyond a mere historical account, transforming it into a nuanced study of the human, strategic, and political dimensions of war. Moreover, the authors showcase a remarkable ability to balance scholarly rigor with accessible prose. Complex military strategies and political intricacies are presented with clarity, making the book accessible to both seasoned historians and readers approaching the topic for the first time. The meticulous attention to detail does not sacrifice readability, ensuring that the narrative remains engaging from start to finish. While the book excels in providing a thorough examination of the events surrounding Pearl Harbour, some readers may find the sheer breadth of information overwhelming. However, the authors' structured presentation mitigates this potential challenge, guiding readers through the narrative with a clear and logical flow. 

◆ Conclusion : 

In conclusion, "Pearl Harbor: The verdict if History" stands as a testament to the authors' dedication to unravelling the complexities of one of the most significant events in modern history. This collaborative effort offers readers a comprehensive and insightful journey into the prelude to infamy, solidifying its place as an essential read for anyone seeking a profound understanding of the Pearl Harbour attack and its enduring repercussions.